As is well known blog called courses (for) telos has become a real police errors, especially the daily The Observer, which would make the nightmares of any editor so meticulously that fell under magnifying glass. Is far from my intentions that Fuck You Tiger engaged in something similar, but we found a curious bug, and not collected by that blog-it's worth pointing it out.
In its Tuesday edition of the newspaper subscription 6 The daily published an interview with the former director of prisons, Enrique Navas, who turned on the fan and made a series of statements that were quoted in many other ways. The prestigious What Happens supplement of El Pais was no exception and on their front pages, citing egregious statements and phrases heard in week, reproduce, not one of the explosive answers but one of the questions Mariano Tucci, the author of the interview, he made to Navas.
The question, according to Que Pasa is " What can you tell the (blank) not have told you otherwise? "
Oh, how funny I said, ask a question self-referential and no means self-referential issues, what did The Daily newsprint, so I quote in the Que Pasa. But then I noticed that my number of daily and it appears that the question posted is: "What can tell The Daily that he has not told otherwise? "
What has happened then?" I can think of three options:
a) There was the typo / correction / armed with my copy of The Daily and appeared strangely alert corrected by a dealer who had a box of movable type on the bike.
b) selective A mysterious virus was introduced into the armed machines Que Pasa and specifically erased the only mention in large print (under the declaration is the source, in lowercase) to a daily competition .
c) What Happens When someone or The Country does not like it, nothing mentioned otherwise appear on their pages.
occurs to us, pure evil intentions we have, which was the third option, namely, an attack of paranoia a bit excessive especially considering that the mention of the phrase Tucci was there just because its formulation it was funny or ridiculous to some of the makers of the supplement. The problem is exposed and it seems they were rescuing it, exactly, otherwise an error, error which of course did not exist, and what there is that messy antiquísma and editorial policy of never mentioning Uruguayan competition in a highlighted. We
strange that old in a modern environment led by Leonardo Haberkorn , whose generous pen is always ready to give lessons in ethics, aesthetics and static journalism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment