Vote Of Thanks Sample For Wedding Ceremony

All that beauty to fart

few months ago I dedicated a post to what I thought (and I think) a nice speech, the Evangelina Carrozo of the EU-Latin America. In this post remarked the natural beauty of the girl being very attractive not exactly suited to the required parameters for the current female beauty. Slightly exceeded ass, tits notorious shortage, somewhat pointed nose and olive skin tone ... the girl was beautiful, but not the kind of artificial beauty and totally European Court that is being promoted in Argentina and worldwide. And he had a spectacular smile.

few months later, the Carrozo not smiling in a photo shoot showing her thinner, with another nose with white skin and moon as big tits. Days later appears as a dancing partner Uruguayan charming symbolic detail, the abominable Dancing with the Stars The most unfortunate product of the ugly bastard race irreducible Marcelo Tinelli. Makes a little speech about the problem but says nothing Gualeguaychú, plays his gimmick like a troupe of repeating his catch phrase Tinelli, and then subjected to the trial of someone as despicable as Gerardo Sofovich , who put a nuclear dump in the center of Gualeguaychú if he thought could win two extra dollars.

And you look at it and says nothing, because it accepts the fatalistic and pragmatic discourse: the "environmental activist" is above all a model that naturalism does not seem incompatible with the plastic filled silicone inside the body and is using his time . And he knew that would happen, but you look at the calendar and just spent the time necessary for the swelling will disappear operations. And you think, "at least until year's end, unless you have sacrificed time that , not next, unless did not get exactly the same tits all others, at least a small gesture signifying ...".

But nothing, I look hard dance, dances well, is funny and cute, like everyone in the world of the funny and cute, like everything else. ***



decide in Gualeguaychú and Colon bridges cut again to ruin the long weekend to protest against a third report (actually a reissue of the first) of the World Bank back to say what they do not want to hear: they consider the minimum risk of contamination it will give loans to Botnia.

few months ago I wrote a series of posts about the unheard deafness and arrogance of the Uruguayan government over the protests of Entre Rios and the inevitability and justice of the measures they had taken environmental assemblies. I wrote about the filthy chauvinist fever broke in Uruguay on the obsequiousness to foreign investment and the legitimate right of peoples to bristle against omnipotent multinationals and money as the measure of all things. I did not change my point of view which remains more or less the same, and apocalyptic rabid environmentalist, but things changed and insanity, idiocy and chauvinism also apparently changed the country.

In these months passed dozens of things went ENCE, spent the Hague Tribunal, passed the Mercosur Dispute Tribunal and, especially, became incredibly stupid the original attitude of the Uruguayan government. Somehow after the Hague Tribunal, a European legal body, yes, but seriously, rejected the request for precautionary measures that Argentina had high Vázquez administration wisely decided not to and triumphalist declarations, in contrast, offer something that had not offered before capriciously: the joint monitoring of the Uruguay River and the effect of pulp mills may have. In fact, taking into account the results of previous studies and the disappearance of ENCE, is the best result that can be achieved without putting entrerrianos bombs. And unless the fairest to undertake a vigorous campaign and equally ruthless about all Argentine companies that directly or indirectly affect the watershed in common and shared courses.

This is something that itself was understood by experienced Greenpeace activists -qualified at the peak of imbecility Uruguay as "terrorists" - who has now dedicated his gaze to the Argentine pulp mills unpresentable placed on the margin of the Paraná. Knowing this the issue on the sensitivity of the Rio de la Plata, Greenpeace decided to stop a particular focus on entrepreneurship as Botnia undoubtedly is environmentally risky, but with control and monitoring instruments that are entirely absent in the Argentine plants, minor size but higher-capacity production proven toxic. The decision of the NGOs was, among other things, fair, there is a limit to what can be require doing a little self-criticism. But the assembly decided to close the eyes, not to grant even the slightest benefit of the doubt even the people and organizations they chose to represent and trigger a crash again useless in terms known to affect Botnia, a company that like it or not already installed despite the efforts almost criminal, and self-destructive-of blackmailing workers plant the company. The environmentalists did not understand that it earned more than what they could expect, now, obeying assemblies further divided and poorly argued, detracted from the legitimacy of their protest turned into a mere abuse that bothers others essentially complete strangers to business pulp and dyed a repellent smell chauvinist nationalism, reinforced by the increasing use xenophobic anthem and flag.

I still think that probably the Botnia plant is polluting the Uruguay River and the orientation of the entire country to cellulose is a historic mistake, but I also believe that the degree of vigilance mounted around the factory makes any other measure of force is judged by suspicion and that, unless it is established a whole new environmental regulations to the Uruguay River and the Rio de la Plata, the inflexibility in this case is simply a wrong-sided and a clear interference in the decisions of another country . The Entre Rios had every reason in the beginning of this conflict, but the reason is not a permanent tattoo and now it's just an act of arrogance and blindness, so the Uruguayan accused of being conservative to the court a few months ago when they were a brave and necessary, when they spoke and covered her ears Uruguay insensitive to their doubts and sorrows. Exactly what do entrerrianos now.

But there also comes also another issue that makes this second wave of cuts in some infamous political moment. Uruguay has just completed negotiations to temporarily approve a free trade agreement with U.S. by the fast track, ie the fast lane and put the treated in the freezer thanks to strong opposition from progressive opinion that held, among other things, that the treaty was incompatible with the presence in Uruguay in the Mercosur and sabotaged the possibility of deepening the regional bloc. Sepoy always argued that Mercosur in Uruguay and that shit attached to it was tied to a stone that sinks into the deep ocean.

Less than a week after the Argentine government claims the right to request information on a chemical plant to be installed in Soriano without even bothering to go through the Foreign Ministry Reinaldo Gargano, controversial man but perhaps the most staunch defender Mercosur in the government of FA, and trascartón the Argentine government does not make a turd to sail to avoid the roadblocks that the Mercosur Dispute Tribunal stated as clearly illegal.

anyone who is screwing with laughter somewhere, and I think that every now and says "fantastic." ***



Among the comments the last post, talking about the tortuous passage of Pedro Bordaberry by two means supposedly serious and objective, I get confused names and claimed one of them belonging to someone that apparently was never in your return. A reader informed and possibly close to writes to Search correcting / denial with regard to this. But he added another three denials, saying the four are the most glaring errors of the post (which in some ways it is a mistake because he is talking about items that appeared in the comments, not the post) and serve as an example of what it's all nonsense. Barbaro, the only problem is that its four incontrovertible examples of mistakes only the first was a mistake and the other three one was a bad information from him and the other two views were not errors themselves.

It reminds me a recent interview I read the beacon of American right Carlos Alberto Montaner . In it, after trying to be funny with some jokes so hilarious as childhood cancer, Montaner said it was preparing a second edition of the Manual Perfect Latin American Idiot, a book published in the mid-nineties with the help of Pliny and Apuleius Mendoza Alvaro Vargas Llosa (son of Mario I do not know what he inherited his two names together.) A book can not and should not miss in the library of the modern right-wing columnist, but it is interesting for anyone interested in the semantics and manipulation of data.

This book, published at the height of the neoliberal and the only thought has been presented as anti- Open Veins of Latin America , but it is really a book of very different characteristics but are primed in the simplicities of Eduardo Galeano. The whole book was a compilation of phrases and truths of the main talking heads the Latin American left, which were submitted and denied in burlesque and devastating. The book was quite a pioneer in the use of insults ("idiot") in an orderly manner as a means to summarize arguments and problems, as if to refute a logical argument is required at least a theoretical development opposite and equal in length sources to refute told by an idiot not needed almost nothing reaches to define it as such. Because he knows that only idiots argue with idiots. The method has been very popular within the right-wing commentators and is almost endemic use between the right (and left part of the) U.S., where since the dogs bolted FOX up views of intellectuals of the stature of Susan Sontag have been dismissed as mere "crap", no one will pay the deserved attention.

But Manual ... has a particularity. Let us agree that if one puts together crap they have said the philosopher-poets of the Latin American left in the last 30 years, the result can not fill a volume but a and large library. But with all this raw material available, Mendoza-Montaner-Vargas Llosa used no more than a limited amount of pure crap and incontestable, and instead presented a curious mixture of nonsense unquestionable with views for them would be nonsense, or, possibly wanted presented as nonsense.

Invention examples similar to those presented (I sold the book on Tristan Narvaja a decade ago and do not want to quote from memory): The poet X said that in Cuba there is no poverty, but socialism has robbed its people hunger of the material. Well, it is obviously stupid, but then put N journalist's opinion who said that Cuba is a very poor country from a capitalist logic but if measured with other parameters (health, education) would not be such a poor country. This is a view similar in appearance to that of the poet X, but radically different in content, it does not presuppose anything romantic and open spaces to different ways of seeing a problem like poverty in Cuba. And the three mischievous boys of Manual ... put them on the same level of idiocy, and occasionally add another phrase in which the economist J says that the rate of malnourished children in Havana is less than in parts of New York, which is true But with the introduction chosen everything is wrapped in the same soup of "idiocy", all is not discussed, discarded, disqualified.

Imagine the second volume of the Handbook, only the speech of Comrade Chávez and his paladins there to fill several chapters, which may be filled with their opinions more respectable, deactivated by the context of "idiocy" and its own name, of course. There is only one antidote to books obscurantist, prejudiced and ignorant as the Manual ... and once again, the independent-minded and encouraged. It is important to be able to recognize that all or nearly all, we are interesting thinkers from Nietzsche to Žižek from Sade to Bangs - have said / written crap sovereign, many of which can be explained by a simple historical context (it is easy to describe the views of the Sunday newspaper on Monday) and others were already in pelotudeces moment of its utterance, but that's not why we read them, but by the other party. Jorge Luis Borges , perhaps the writer who more I read and re-read in my life, was a machine that abnormalities (not very useful from the perspective of the Manual ... because the "stupid" sign of old age very different from the examples from these three musketeers of the only truth, and also to theirs, would add), but not these that have made me read it, and I have not read "despite ...", but integrated into its chiaroscuro, in his arguments weak and stubborn blindness. But it is also important to recognize the lights and successes of authors thinkers who do not agree at all, I can say that I have read pages of the most sensible, and sometimes very attractive, I think people almost pathologically mistaken as Paul Johnson . Martin Amis or Carlos Maggi (never Carlos Montaner, which does not surprise me), because not only are many things that allow the diversity of perspectives without being relegated to the quarantine of "idiocy" but also because, as the Yankees say, even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Carlos Alberto Montaner

, the great separator of reason and idiocy, has meanwhile got an interesting achievement: to be despised even by the Cuban-American right to whose defense has dedicated his life. The reason is simple: the Miami Herald found that the violent anti-leftist preaching Cuban was funded by the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, an entity of the U.S. government paid him for criticizing the government of Fidel Castro , Montaner was something that supposedly love for the cause. To defend, this genius had no better idea to declare their ignorance as Transfer Office did not pay him but to its distributor, Firms Press. The brilliant journalist obvious what a first year student of journalism found immediately: he was the owner of Signatures Press. Cornered, Montaner escrbió a long disclaimer in which he named several other names they had written on behalf of state agencies, but was saved by the fact that those names had done so unlike him honorary. Which produced a strong response from the conservative press against him, calling it directly from "informer."

When you're a spokesman for the right and even the Wall Street Journal treat you like a rat, obviously you're not the most qualified of the voices. But in his last visit to Montevideo, Montaner was received in the offices of The Country , journal regularly publishes his columns, like a giant of contemporary thought. Which, contrary to what seems, proof that idiocy is not so relative. ***



A runaway bus is worn checkpoint the taxi stand near where I live, and with it one of the veterans who work in it, leaving it in pretty bad shape. Step ahead of the twisted iron bars and see a tachero whom I know from talking to a weak view of thirty years. When the skinny will I go and ask the tachero by the accident and the wound veteran status. He tells me the detail of what happened and the current status of the type, saying that it is much better and recovering.

then laughs and tells me if I saw the skinny I was talking to him. He says he approached to ask exactly the same, but specifically on the hit status. "And you think it will work?" He says tachero who asked him a few times until finally propose, "because I could take care of the stop if the guy did not come back." The tachero tells me that at the end scared the vulture saying that there is a lot more people working at that stop. Both agree that people are very bad. ***



a couple of months ago I declared my intentions to close this blog, partly tired of it and partly overwhelmed by the growth of hearing the same growth that had been the end of their conversational exchange characteristics and intimate nicks functioning as mere formality and not as masks. I explained the reasons for this and, as often happens with things that are made on impulse for a long time, I followed along the same, just down the pace of tickets, but keep it as an escape valve.

(Un) fortunately the dynamic exchanges annoying it had reached the blog is maintained and deepened into reality thanks to the emergence of two or three scribes compulsive willing to challenge each and every one of my speeches, trying to play what appears to be understood as a space of power-when reality is just a space occupied by a large non-power-demanding, celebrating as victories each resigned and tired abandonment of some endless discussion-pulse, ignoring the characteristics and untimely blog-characteristics that imply that my opinion on, say The human race is diametrically different on a Saturday and a Tuesday hangover spring-seeking contradictions, inaccuracies, making this blog friends more or less invisible in a fucking internet forum, with all its evils, throlls and illegibility. Ok, can you tell me that the world is full of assholes and should not require greater attention, but they ruin the landscape enough for all this to be defaced.

never interested me FYT popularity, which always had good intentions elitist, but its comfort and space for free expression of people who have understood their characteristics. No sense arguing I spent twenty or deleting comments from fans who fell NTvG here because after the 200,000 visit the Google page ranks higher than some fan pages of the band. So one has to banks to be pissed by an idiot who can not write "idiot" with the B right and should not be reading a page that could be called "not skinny, I did not like" and never even raised considering the sensitivity of fan, which has been much considered by the sellers. This was raised as an open space but not for everyone, a place he did not think having to put a sign on the door for visitors to understand that it was not for everyone. "Elitist, snobbish ...? Of course, and proud of it: when all spaces are dedicated to taste and tolerance average, the lowest common denominator as a of all things, the celebration of mediocrity less exclusive, why not go the opposite way? Why do not discriminate and release a small amount of view representative of the market demands and respect, understood as a form of cowardice?. No, not here: human die. I began writing to friends and acquaintances with common interests, now I write for people who can not write and critique my writing, which does not share my tastes or aesthetic interest you but you need reviled, who does not have the slightest fucking idea about the topics I speak but look for crack in what I say to treat me as an ignoramus, who thinks but despises what I think, you do not like this blog but it seems a very special co-opt their differences. I required a democracy and openness that was always the enemy. No, I said, humans die.

(Leo as I write this that Practical Works, the often frustrating but sometimes fascinating conglomerate of Argentine journalists, bloggers also on the verge of disappearing. Many of the other blogs that interest me do not go up a moderately post interesting places for months and totally dull look. Perhaps the golden age of blogs and some overestimation is over.)

Actually I'm not complaining and I have a good excuse: I just want to warn that within a month ago, FYT is cleared, literally. Not only abandoned the blog but I think deleting each and every one of your entries, you do not do it for (pure) evil but for two reasons: I do not want are things that I said there, hanging on the web and helpless in a blog I do not plan to enter more. On the other hand there is a lot of what I wrote that I re-use it, so I prefer to disappear earlier. Nothing is lost, with the people we have already established contact can continue to do so through other channels, with no other hope to cross paths again in my fucking life, and they do not know what category they are, they can always invite a drink and find out.

In the coming days I will post up a final farewell, a post about music, as it should be, and that's all folks . Those who need their space of expression recall the basic philosophy of punk and become their own blogs. Either way it never was a kind of open mike . Many people do not understand that or simple environmental protocols.

I do not regret anything, in fact there were times he was so good, he should have made money, and maybe we did. But it's like poker, you have to go when you're winning.

Ways To Break Metacarpal

Journalist, journalist ... Mucho macho

Like all Uruguayans, the "debate" (a common euphemism for ambush journalism) Bordaberry Jr .- Michelini Jr. left me as surprised, but unless the check, at least for many respondents in the street these days, was a kind of contest in which Michelini Jr. lost. Or confirm the unusual ignorance of the media by publicizing the defense of Juan Maria Bordaberry would present their dirty recordings as evidence, something that even the stupidest of shysters know that it is legally inadmissible silly (and useless) . Or note that the majority of Uruguayans do not recognize a press operation the size of the cock of John Holmes even if they leave ass like a flower.

But I want to talk about something else and are two facts / opinions related to the two sides means that lent themselves to this amazing cleaning operation abhorrent dictator and member ever expelled from the Colorado Party - Julio Maria Bordaberry, ie Urban Area and Search.

The Urban Zone is already incredible, I remember, despite being the antithesis of thought of their drivers, have defended what I thought was a good example of revitalization of the language of television news programs, and have noted that actually the speech of the program was reactionary but valid, the sense that exposure is not insignificant in itself by the fact that I do not share. But Urban Area has been something more interesting: from who expelled Gustavo Escanlar the program has definitely turned into pure speech and yellow hard right (let's be fucked to become more right for casting to Escanlar) and operate politically left and right on issues such as (in) security "of which have become the major broadcasters / media terrorists as well as cutting-edge work in the interests of the fall of Minister José Díaz - or judicial power (remember the report on the judge Eguren, judge unpresentable but against whom the report did nothing more than piling assumptions, and remember also that the emphasis on the judge had a lot to do with the actions of the same in the case Peirano, sensitive issue for an employee of The Observer as Gabriel Pereira ).

But I want to focus on a point that is not an operation but merely repulsive opinion from the absolute ignorance and feathering. Before serving Bordaberry Peter Bell, the three drivers spent the previous block ZUR talking about the "missed opportunity" of Free Trade Agreement with U.S. They did, of course, with a train of toy giving round the table in relation to the silly and repeated metaphor Vázquez on the need to jump on the bandwagon of TLC before they pass you by. The three drivers complained bitterly and without the slightest qualms about how he had missed an historic chance was to get us well and we would take the First World (the memory will menemismo recalled the pure language of the mouths of three conductors). Cecilia Bonino almost pouting and said she was working in slums and used to be in contact with these poor people that he had taken an opportunity to raise its head, only for ideological reasons and backward, and that was something I could not believe. Well, I personally do not think Cecilia Bonino can get a real idea of \u200b\u200bwhat life is really lumpen or even a dozen of these make it a gang-bang Miguelete the shore, but I was not very important " ideological. "

After the president of stupidity trying to opposition to the FTA as "ideological" against economic reality, a theory that assumes that the economy is a natural law that weighs no ideology-something that does not take a philosopher to hold his head at the paradox, since this theory itself is, by definition, totally "ideological" - all has been repeated like parrots revealed truth without stopping a second to think about the nonsense they are saying. But besides the three journalists ie people informed, the program is spent in the ass an objective and essential: the FTA for the fast track wrecked by the opposition is not "ideological" of the small left-wing fundamentalist groups are sprouting every time they see a U.S. flag, but precisely because of opposition within the FA in the non-"ideological" and rather moderate. The TLC was wrecked, or was delayed because the cretin Danilo Astori keeps repeating that he wants, stubborn as belly-eating crow because of opposition from economists of the caliber of Carlos Quijano , political analysts as Gerardo Caetano, politicians and Alberto Couriel , journalists like William Waskman , intellectuals such as Hugo Achugar ... that is, people a thousand times more intelligent and prepared than the three drivers ZUR, people who asked the questions that none of the neo-liberal spokesmen, from Astoria to Isaac Alfie - wanted to do, and that just did not know respond. Questions that did not come from the moral outrage anti-imperialism but of the simple scale that assesses the results from a pragmatic point of view . And lo

key word: pragmatism. I do not necessarily seem wrong for a country decides not to trade on a preferential basis and do not establish economic ties (ie, politicians) very consistent with murderous nations like U.S., China or Israel, in fact I'd like to see more often. But I'm not a fool to ignore the fact that almost half the population still mired in poverty, thanks to good driving gear neo-liberal in recent decades, the amount of choice is rather stark. And, pragmatically , an FTA with the U.S. can be beneficial, something that to me or to those who were on edge against the same we were able to convince pragmatic arguments. But nevertheless

Ignacio Álvarez front springs are cameras and claims, again and again, pragmatism in government pragmatism, by God, abandon the ideology, pragmatism now. And one is left wondering what the hell this guy mean by pragmatism .

I will not bore readers by explaining the history and meaning of the word originates from the Greek praxis , nor recalling the American philosophical school that William James pragmatism defined as a paradox, a ideology . If in doubt do a search and make inquiries. But what would that tell-low and slow if you can so that no problems-that pragmatism , unless the school is a follower of philosophical (ideological) of James, not a word identical to under . Pragmatism is a capacity, as indicated by its name, a practice, an instrument by which someone sacrifices a priori conviction in light of the events or the lesser evil theory. Is not unusual, either in this government, nor in the West in general, rather the opposite. It is not related to the East praise as a distinctive change of life, because this at all case would suggest the trip of a belief to another. It is simply what is meant as a convenience, high degree of ideology and, as I said before, not necessarily a virtue .

In fact one of the most repellent human beings is the moral pragmatism, or use convenient of human relationships. It's something we all know as fallutería, everyday betrayal, manipulation or trepadurismo, and all people of minimal decency reject with disgust, though increasingly, as one of the worst pests of social life, but perhaps as you are not commonly referred to as moral but pragmatic terms más groseros, es posible que gente no muy informada como los de ZUR no la relacionen con su querida palabra de origen griego. Además estoy haciendo trampas, se está hablando de pragmatismo en términos de conducción gubernamental, no en casos individuales. Bueno, ahí se podría apuntar a que la filosofía pragmática consiste en sacrificar un pensamiento macro, una filosofía moral en aras de una contingencia particular. Bueno, en estos casos tampoco -a menos que se sea de la escuela de James, repito- se considera al pragmatismo como una virtud sino como una necesidad y, a menos que estemos hablando de fundamentalistas, una necesidad de diverge el daño para más adelante. Pongo un ejemplo kid: a castaway, who is also environmental-lands on a small island where there is only one rare species of coconut palm. When you get the cold night the castaway decides to cut the coconut (after fixed if it is not Keith Richards above) and use the wood to keep warm and not freeze to death. The castaway knows that is not only eliminating a rare species of palm, but also is eliminating its food source once you run out of coconuts collected. But pragmatically concludes that their chances of survival are exposing more so every day to cold at night and kicks the problem cutting the coconut forward and making it a nice fire. There is nothing good in itself or virtuous in its decision and in fact an expert on the fauna and flora of the islands may have a more focused second opinion. In fact, pragmatism, as in the case of NAFTA, which could entail the expulsion of the Mercosur and various misfortunes long-time objective has more to do with a bet, with chance and with a short-term vision more than anything else.

This claim economistic pragmatism as a virtue is an integral part of apocalyptic neo-capitalist thinking, but is fully exposed as ideological or fart who's applied their private lives. Here's an example rude: economistic vision of absolute maximization of economic benefits as the only value would result in its consistency, for example, that drivers of ZUR-two of which are considered physically attractive people take advantage of their media exposure, to mount a empresita of fellatio between block and block, or sacrificing a few minutes after closing the program. A home economics will come out great and, considering the popularity of ZUR will not (hopefully) to be permanent, this may be a passing train only once. However, I believe and I believe that none of its members sell oral favors in the free spaces program. Which is very pragmatic .

The memorable last Wednesday's show ended with a striking reflection of Gabriel Pereira I used to go to part two of this post. After the exchange of obscenities and false dobledemoníaco balance between sniper and ambush, Pereira, pragmatic man of which eventually became the direct relationship with the Uruguayan PCU through its work in to The Republic climb The Observer to have direct source Sanguinetti, became angry and said something like " Do you know what? I I have rotten truth to this matter of looking back, I have rotten with that instead of engaging in future follow and continue to stir the past .. . "An interesting thought from someone who has helped set up the circus" widows of insecurity "as the equivalent right of the relatives of the disappeared, but whose most interesting part is not the usual rant vs future. Justice , tommy scared the sectors repeat again and again as if the economic country every time to stop a milico put in jail, but the first part: "A ME I have rotten ... . "A VOS -person with no personal relationship with any of these cases you have "rotten" - well, what? "When justice became the instrument of personal recreation of Gabriel Pereira?

There are two mysteries of media politics that I'll never finish explaining, and that somehow are related, one is the image of great democrat, maintained for decades and just eroded by strong data and statement as a pineapple Tyson, the former president and current senator for the Partido Colorado Julio Maria Sanguinetti. The other image inexplicable to me is the aura of objectivity and independence of the weekly Search. And both pictures were recently hand an event last week that perhaps went slightly unnoticed, despite the 5 page dedicated search-because of the scandal-Michelini Bordaberry.

The issue, as many know, was as follows: someone made an anonymous call to the "Blue Line" of INAU (Institute of Child and Adolescent)-line established during the last government of Sanguinetti, so that witnesses domestic violence against children could make their complaints without having to compromise by going to a branch and being virtually identified by characters who are violent denunciation. The system, although it may allow unjust accusation cases is established in many parts of the world on the assumption that, above all, protect the child. Lo and behold, denounced the call Pastor Gabriel, deputy editor of Search, accusing him of verbal abuse toward his 6 year old son. From this the Uruguay heard the statement of Senator intempestuosa colorado, oh and ex-president, Julio Maria Sanguinetti, who honored the search period in question seemed important enough to devote an entire session of the Senate to what claimed was a "verbal harassment and in fact some media and journalists considered opponents of the government of President Vázquez . "And suddenly the whole INAU was on the defensive. The argument was that the complaint had been received the day after that search advertising Pastor a" hard "complaint about violations of secularism in the Institute and considering that the complaint was anonymous, for the defendant, because the call, contrary to the assertions by Pastor at first, had been properly registered for the service of the "Blue Line" - all had to be done obviously a false accusation designed to make you a hard time with Pastor and Flia.

That may be, in fact, gives to suspect, "but also may not, in fact the truth was unknown to any it was not Pastor, his family and the complainant. INAU until the matter was made public by the intervention of Sanguinetti and his raging lieutenants, had maintained a prudent reserve this respect and, possibly, the case had not been leaked to the press if he had not come back, by express Pastor-order issue of debate in the Senate.

There are many ugly things in this case: in fact we can consider that there is now a de facto conflict between Search and government. This was shown in the statements, a few months ago, labeled A Search Vazquez and other media automatically "opposition" (which in the light of subsequent events does not seem so crazy) or the monumental amount of rotting flesh-issued search dedicating entire pages-5 on the murders of Michelini Ruiz-Gutierrez two weeks ago. Rotten meat does not take a genius to trace their origin to the house of Bordaberry Jr., and argued with great conviction that there had been involved in these murders Uruguayan-exclusive work, of course, Argentine-and perfidious the phone had been a fortune tupamaro that Michelini kept under the bed or something. A "cleansing operation" disgusting beginning to prepare the punch line since last Wednesday in Urban Area, that is not exactly objective and verified information Search for which prides itself on publishing, but something made with a clear intent to affect a trial of notorious political consequences.

But hey, maybe they have a confrontation and perhaps it the call has been forged by an official INAU resentful, angry about the note. Now, what did you do then INAU to receive the call? discard "a priori without investigation because a search period is obviously incapable of committing a crime? Breaking the security protocol of the "Blue Line" and give the complainant, the journalist? Perform an operation "hyper-secret research to maintain an number of privileges that you would never be a butcher of the Hill? Who the fuck is believed to be Gabriel Pastor to receive preferential treatment in a case in which, as far as the facts speak, involves an act of violence against a minor? I personally believe the thesis may well be a false call, and if so is the responsibility of INAU provenance research, upon verification of their falsity, something which can only be investigating those involved. In fact and in my experience, there is no reason for a journalist to have crowned. To be honest, I get the impression that the profession, by its nature, feeds some psychotic features, something of what we know of many examples.

(Speaking of guilds, APU, the guild as useless as opposed to the destruction of the union of the Republic was similar to that of a fart against the wind, then pulled chest to show solidarity with Pastor without having taken two minutes to internalize on the subject, as well as the SIP (Inter American Press Association, an organization of traditional links with Search). Because there are priorities and there are journalists who are more journalists than others).

Pastor's behavior, calling the hounds Colorado to defend not even ask why, not at all unusual. Almost could be considered as an editorial policy. And the case is good to remember one of the most shameful pages of colluding media-power in the history of Uruguayan democracy.

In 1997 Danilo Arbilla , then director of weekly Search and vice president of the SIP , sold a house in Punta del Este to a front corporation Juarez Cartel. Papers on both sides are processed by the clerk Javier Morassi personal friend of Arbilla and the Minister of Interior, the clerk also Guillermo Stirling. In March 2000, the Drug Squad of Punta del Este presented to justice a criminal complaint to investigate the assets of the Juarez Cartel in Uruguay, which are mentioned Arbilla clerk and his accomplices.

A couple of days later Danilo Arbilla was presented at the offices of Luis Hierro López, who was then Vice President, showing him a copy of the complaint directly and mysteriously stolen from the court, and claimed by the discredit that he means on being involved in such research. The next day, fast as a cadet (perhaps Gabriel Pereira speed that berates the current legislators to approve treaties blind) Iron in his office quoted the National Director of Police, Inspector General Roberto Rivero , y concertó una cita con Danilo Arbilla para ese mismo día. En ella Arbilla y Rivero habrían acordado "eliminar todos los juicios de valor" de la denuncia en cuestión.

Es así que la Brigada Antidrogas de Punta del Este presentó una segunda denuncia, pero no pudo dejar de mencionar a Arbilla porque, efectivamente, éste le había vendido una casa a los narcotraficantes. Cuatro días después el cadete Hierro se volvió a entrevistar con Rivero para hacerle saber que Arbilla no ha quedado nada conforme con la segunda presentación de la denuncia. Al otro día Stirling le presentó un memorandum redactado por Rivero y explicando la situación al presidente de Uruguay, Jorge Batlle, who had nothing better to do, obviously. Almost simultaneously, the Home Office lifted the second complaint.

But Argentina is then discovered that police undercover office of the Juarez Cartel in Buenos Aires received three calls from Montevideo and the three came from the office of Danilo Arbilla Search. Rivero then sought to reopen the case, but the minister denied Stirling, also dismantled a few days later, the Drug Squad in Punta del Este. Days later

Rivero Arbilla phoned home and as he threatened. The next day Stirling-politician who was never characterized by speed-fired Rivero of the National Police, the Minister Stirling gave as reasons "discrepancies in the conduct of the war on drugs." A week later Gap issued a note stating that the dismissal of the inspector Rivero was due to his refusal to stop investigating Arbilla. Asked by the press, the Minister Stirling explained that Rivero was dismissed for threatening and Arbilla accused without evidence, and called it a "terrorist state." Rivero was, before being appointed a controversial name for being identified as linked to the repression in the years of lead (as good amount of narcotics cops Uruguay). However, this only became relevant at this time, being remembered for the weekly search despite not being very consistent with its policy of "no looking back." Arbilla

then devoted himself to expose a conspiracy theory against that would be involved in the weekly PS, the newspaper Republic, the U.S. Customs Service, Rivero, the weekly Brecha , the radical left, the weekly Mate Amargo Argentina and police, all conspired to discredit them. Search Two journalists then took calls made from the office of his boss, saying that they had done to investigate the case and the APU filed a complaint over what they considered a puncture on the phones to search, without recognizing that the only thing was handled was the source and destination calls, not its content.

On June 13 President Batlle publicly supported the minister's decision to relieve the inspector Stirling Rivero. On June 14 counsel for the Police Prosecutor, attorney Juan Carlos Martino , refused to initiate an administrative inquiry into Rivero and unwavering in his resignation. Stirling later explained that he never ordered the police to investigate tax resigns Rivero, but just wanted you to call and to ratify or rectify his sayings, and she does not plan summary. The opposition called for the formation of an investigative commission but declined official representatives. And everything was there.

What's clear in all this, of course Arbilla no relationship with drug traffickers (which in 2000 seemed a nonsense but what my point of view has become more extensive in recent times) or goodness and honesty of the inspector Rivero-After a potential torturer and was relocated to another post-but the more unusual privileges enjoyed SNTE law who was just the director of a medium "Independent and objective", around which stood the entire state apparatus in the hands of party government at that time was to ensure and guarantee their rights not logical city, but the total inaccessibility of his person to the police research instruments which all other citizens have to submit without protest. A city so special that not only get access on a personal meeting with a vice president (something that occurs to us is not as normal in the world of John Doe), but also manages to have the vice-president, interior minister and the president himself operating openly in its favor against an investigation arising within those same powers.

Who can wonder, then, that Pastor is considered worthy of similar privileges? But the government changed, and one of those independent prestige not secure search box as before any preferential treatment, because in one of those things were not so independent. No I mean why did the kingdom of justice and fairness, I would like to see that the current government would demand compliance with labor laws newspaper friend Republic with the same rigor with which it is required other patterns, but at least Fasano not have the nerve to stand as "independent" or "objective."

Press (understanding as such not only to print media but journalism in general), as the word pragmatism, neither good nor bad in itself, but obviously for many holders of it is a kind of privilege that separates them from others mortal and that makes their views and sensitivities something important, something so important to have to modify the legal reality in relation to it. I remember that perfect moment when the great historian Carlos Demasi , questioned by ignorant people who may not even recognize the truth of the sexual history of her sisters said in a report, in relation to the protest of a legislator who said offended by Demasi historical observations-" Why the legislature thinks that his sensitivity is so important? why do not you go to hell? ."

course in some of these cases we may not be talking about sensitivity, but rather of impunity. Uruguayans know something in excess.

This complex and lengthy exercise of ellipsis seems an excuse not to discuss the burning issue in question and that really matters, the "debate" Bordaberry-Michelini. But for me it's not worth talking about it, I think any person of goods (excluding therefore the idiot who titled The Observer newspaper the next day matching program the situation of both children) has to be drawn clear conclusions about it. However

read about online surveys and came to the conclusion that the Uruguayans are mostly good people. In the same huge percentages ranging from 75 to 85% of the opinionated, Michelini state that was "unmasked" or "lost" the debate or the treacherous tactics of Bordaberry was "justified." And of course we must be very alert to notice that some supporters of Bordaberry must have been busy as online voting several times because the rates are ridiculous. But it is still worrying, because many of those views must be valid and if a rational person have the perception that he lied because another has been recorded in private saying something that was always implicit in their public statements, just because the other side is a madman screaming "you're a liar! unmasked you," then we are in the oven. I have no particular sympathy for Rafael Michelini, then by his family and that of Gutierrez Ruiz and by the growing number killed by the dictatorship of Juan Maria Bordaberry-president elected by the Colorado Party, to which he belonged when he gave the hit and that, again because I feel like it was never sent off, "commanded with unusual cruelty. I think it was wrong Michelini irritated and going the program, should have simply listened to the recording on the phone and then say "yes I just said what? ."

recently accused the younger generation to be totally literal, not being able to mistrust and uncritically accept what they say. Maybe I was unfortunately wrong, maybe this is not a feature of the younger generation but for society in general. But one thing is the online surveys and one is justice and, mysteriously, perhaps this is time for justice.